CDC

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
Created in	1 July 1946
And a major problem since	1 July 1946
Website	cdc.gov

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) purports to be the guardian of public health against epidemics, pandemics, and other health threats. However, its track record tells a different story. From neglecting certain diseases to its massively inconsistent and needlessly oppressive response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the CDC has repeatedly demonstrated that it is not an ally of public health, but rather a tool of government overreach and incompetence.

What Is This?

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) is a federal agency under the Department of Health and Human Services. It's ostensibly responsible for protecting public health and safety through the control and prevention of disease, injury, and disability in the US and internationally.

Why Does This Exist?

The CDC was created in 1946 as the Communicable Disease Center, initially focused on malaria control. Over time, its mission expanded to include various public health issues. The official rationale for its existence is to safeguard public health through research, information dissemination, and disease prevention strategies. However, it has increasingly become a tool for expanding government control over personal health decisions.

What Has It Done?

The CDC's actions have often been contrary to its stated mission:

• Mishandled numerous disease outbreaks, most notably the COVID-19 pandemic
• Issued contradictory and often politically motivated guidelines
• Overstepped its authority by imposing nationwide mandates (e.g., eviction moratoriums)
• Manipulated data to support predetermined policy outcomes
• Prioritized certain health issues while neglecting others based on political considerations
• Contributed to the erosion of public trust in health institutions

What's Wrong With It?

The CDC embodies numerous problems inherent to centralized health bureaucracies:

• Politicization of Science: The CDC often allows political considerations to influence its recommendations.
• Lack of Accountability: Despite major failures, the CDC faces little consequence for its actions.
• Mission Creep: The agency has expanded far beyond its original purpose, becoming involved in non-communicable diseases and social issues.
• One-Size-Fits-All Approach: CDC guidelines often fail to account for regional differences and individual circumstances.
• Conflicts of Interest: Close ties with pharmaceutical companies and other industry players compromise its objectivity.
• Infringement on Personal Liberty: The CDC's recommendations are often used to justify coercive government policies.

How Do We Get Rid Of It?

Abolishing the CDC would require action from Congress. As libertarians, we advocate for:

• Legislation to dismantle the CDC and devolve public health responsibilities to state and local levels
• Encouraging private sector and non-profit initiatives in disease research and prevention
• Promoting individual responsibility and education in health matters
• Supporting legal challenges to CDC overreach and unconstitutional mandates
• Advocating for a free market in healthcare to improve responsiveness to health threats

Questions For Further Research

• How Has The CDC's Role Evolved Since Its Inception?
• What Are The Constitutional Limits On Federal Public Health Powers?
• How Do Decentralized Health Systems In Other Countries Compare To The CDC Model?
• What Private Sector Alternatives Exist For Disease Monitoring And Control?

This article is a stub. You can help Dissent by expanding it.