Why Caucus Endorsements

From Dissent
Revision as of 09:31, 13 August 2017 by Strangelv (talk | contribs) (Why moderate libertarians might want to support candidates we endorse)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Brainstorm Article Graphic.svg This article is a Brainstorm

It's not quite a stub -- it has less pretense of organization than that right now.
It does not need to be particularly tidy until someone is ready to turn this into a formal article.

When this enter the realm of being a formal article, please remove this tag.

You can help this wiki by adding your ideas on this subject to this page.
Any idea about this -- even an incomplete and messily presented one -- helps this page as a starting point.

Thank you.


The idea here is for a handout to explain the value of our endorsed candidates.


What You Get With a Radical Caucus Endorsed Candidate

  • You can be confident that you're getting an actual Libertarian, not someone who's really with another party who is only wanting access to our ballot line.


What You Won't Get With a Radical Caucus Endorsed Candidate

  • You can be confident that our endorsed candidates won't promote gun control
  • You can be confident that our endorsed candidates won't call for new taxes
  • You can be confident that our endorsed candidates won't call for new government programs
  • You can be confident that our endorsed candidates won't force people to bake cakes
  • You can be confident that our endorsed candidates won't be itching for the next war
  • You can be confident that our endorsed candidates won't endorse Hillary Clinton
  • You can be confident that our endorsed candidates won't be taking nationalistic positions
  • You can be confident that our endorsed candidates won't be taking socially conservative positions