Commerce Department
| |
| United States Department of Commerce | |
|---|---|
| Created in | 14 February 1903 |
| And a major problem since | 14 February 1903 and especially after the 1920s |
| Website | commerce.gov |
The Department of Commerce, established in 1903, has notoriously close ties with corporate interests. During President Herbert Hoover's administration in the late 1920s and early 1930s, the department expanded its influence within the federal government. This expansion has facilitated increased regulation and practices that favor established monopolies, which has stifled economic competition and contributed to widening economic inequality.
What Is This?
The United States Department of Commerce is a cabinet-level agency of the federal government. Its stated mission is to promote job creation, economic growth, sustainable development, and improved standards of living for all Americans. In reality, it often serves as a conduit for corporate influence in government policy and a mechanism for stifling free market competition.
Why Does This Exist?
The Department of Commerce was originally created to foster, promote, and develop foreign and domestic commerce. However, its role has expanded significantly over time, becoming a tool for government intervention in the economy and a means of favoring certain corporate interests over others.
What Has It Done?
The Department of Commerce has a long history of actions that have distorted the free market:
- Implemented regulations that disproportionately benefit large corporations at the expense of small businesses
- Engaged in corporate welfare through various grant and subsidy programs
- Manipulated economic statistics to support predetermined policy outcomes
- Expanded government control over various sectors of the economy, including telecommunications and weather forecasting
- Facilitated the growth of monopolies and oligopolies through selective enforcement of regulations
What's Wrong With It?
The Department of Commerce embodies numerous problems inherent to government intervention in the economy:
- Corporate Capture: Close ties with big business lead to policies that favor established interests over market competition
- Mission Creep: The department has expanded far beyond its original purpose, becoming involved in areas unrelated to commerce
- Inefficiency: Government attempts to manage commerce often lead to misallocation of resources
- Politicization of Economic Data: The department's control over key economic statistics can lead to manipulation for political purposes
- Barrier to Innovation: Regulations and policies often hinder new market entrants and innovative business models
- Centralized Economic Planning: The department's activities often amount to attempts at centralized economic planning, which is inherently flawed
How Do We Get Rid Of It?
Abolishing the Department of Commerce would require action from Congress. As libertarians, we advocate for:
- Legislation to dismantle the Department of Commerce and eliminate its regulatory functions
- Privatizing or eliminating services currently provided by the department (e.g., weather forecasting, patent office)
- Ending all forms of corporate welfare and government subsidies
- Promoting free market solutions for economic growth and development
- Decentralizing the collection and reporting of economic statistics to prevent manipulation
Questions For Further Research
- How Has The Department Of Commerce's Role Evolved Since Its Creation In 1903?
- What Are The Economic Costs Of The Department's Regulatory Activities?
- How Do Other Countries Manage Commerce Without A Similar Centralized Department?
- What Would Be The Impact Of Privatizing Key Functions Like The Patent Office Or Weather Services?
External Links
- [Insert links to studies on the economic impact of Department of Commerce policies]
- [Insert links to critiques of government intervention in commerce]
This article is a stub. You can help Dissent by expanding it.